Prada Outlet Store: t him in said office.
t him in said office. There were two assessors districts in said county in , in one of which G. I. Marsh was commissioner of the revenue and in the other Elijah Flesher was the commissioner, the latter was called district No.and the former No The said Marsh returned to the auditor of Virginia the taxes on licenses assessed by him in his district in the spring of , but the said Flesher made no return of the taxes on licenses assessed by him for that yea Prada Outlet r and none were charged on the auditors books against the sheriff. It is shown, that the plaintiff as sheriff collected at least one hundred and eightythree dollars on taxes on licenses assessed in said Fleshers district. It is, therefore, contended by the defendants that the said overpayment of two hundred and eighteen dollars and sixty cents claimed by the plaintiff was in fact money collected by him on license taxes in said district No.and for which Prada Outlet Online he should have been but was not charged by the auditor of Virginia. There is also testimony tending to show that the plaintiff collected fully as much as two hundred and eighteen dollars and sixty cents on license taxes in said district No.for which he has never accounted to or been charged with by the State of Virginia or this State. It appearing, however, from the books of the auditors office of Virginia, that the plaintiff, in the manner aforesaid, Prada Outlet Store has overpaid the amount charged to him by said sum of two hundred and eighteen dollars and sixty cents, and the claim against the said Abraham R. Hall having been by law transfered to the State of West Virginia, he, the plaintiff, or some one in his behalf, procured the passage of an act by the Legislature of the latter State, on Februaryallowing him as one of the sureties of said Abraham Ii. Hall credit on the debt due the State from said Hall, for t Prada Handbags Sale he said sum of two hundred and eighteen dollars and sixty centsActs ,. That afterwards the said Hall, with the concurrence of the plaintiff, in a settlement with the agent of the State, was allowed a credit on his said indebtedness to the State for said two hundred and eighteen dollars and sixty cents and he