Prada Outlet Online: the title of the
the title of the defendants predecessors to the premises prior to the execution of the lease, the affidavit distinctly avers that the strip of land was then occupied and used by the Pennsylvania Canal Company. Three quarters of a century ago. in Woods v. Farmere, Watts, S, Am. Dec we said, adopting the English doctrine, that the possession of a tenant is notice of his actual interest, whether as lessee or purchaser. In the more recent case of Jamison Prada Outlet v. Dimock, Ta we reiterated the rule, holding that it is the duty of purchasers of real estate to make Inquiry respecting the rights property to pay said two hundred and eighteen dollars and sixty cents and the interest thereon and for general relief.The said Henry Brannon, trustee, the said Abraham R. and John S. Hall and their sureties aforesaid were made defendants to said bill, and the said defendants demurred thereto which demurrer was overruled. Prada Outlet Online The said Abraham R. Hall having died intestate, his personal representative and heirs were by bill of revivor made defendants to this suit and served with process. And subsequently, an amended bill was filed against the administrator and heirs of Jonathan Hall in which the plaintiff alleges that said Abraham R. Hall had sold to said Jonathan Hall a large portion ol the lands conveyed to Henry Brannon, trustee, as aforesaid and that a part of the procee Prada Outlet Store ds of said lands so sold was applied to the payment of liabilities of said Abraham R. Hall, but that said Jonathan Hall is not entitled to substitution on account of said application of the proceeds of said sale as against the rights of the plaintiff.Emmet J. OBrien, administrator of said Jonathan Hall, deceased, tiled his answer to said amended bill, in which he denied that the plaintiff had any right to resort to the lands sold by said Abraham R. Hal Prada Handbags Sale l to his intestate.The facts in the record show, that the plaintiff, as successor of said Abraham R. Hall, was sheriff of said county from January to July and that as such sheriff he paid into the auditors office of Virginia two hundred and eighteen dollars and sixty cents in excess of what was charged agains