While the plural of anecdote is unquestionably not data, it does offer some exciting observations. WoW Common is a web-site that compiles plenty of information about abilities, glyphs, wow equipment, enchants, gems, and perhaps reforges for every course and spec and ranks them all determined by their "popularity."

　　The site's creator states the intent at the rear of the positioning would be to give a "one-stop-shop for... gamers who don't hold the the perfect time to totally study what skills, enchants, glyphs, gems or equipment to work on future," but this pill is usually a bit not easy to swallow. As Albert Einstein after explained, "What is correct isn't normally popular and what is common isn't often suitable," meaning, within our situation, that because a the vast majority of people use a single expertise or glyph will not imply that it's the correct 1 to work with in all circumstances, or that any with the information aligns with what theorycrafting has determined as "optimal."

　　Does that necessarily mean the info the creator has gathered is with no value? Not at all -- viewing the developments of just what the website claims being "top people," a designation I think is assigned dependant on their level of progression, can provide quite a few important insights into the local community as a total. Blizzard collects a ton of data such as this to ensure that any solitary expertise or glyph isn't going to pull ahead of the other individuals. In the same way, if some trinket or any other piece of gear is out of the blue being used by a substantial team of individuals, there must be a motive at the rear of that. Is it the mechanics in the gear that may be edging out aggressive alternatives, or can it be just sheer availability that is definitely making it so ubiquitous?

　　I promote you to check the location out and draw your very own conclusions -- just remember to choose your skepticism with you!