<< < 2012 - 8 > >>
| 日 |
一 |
二 |
三 |
四 |
五 |
六 |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| 5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
| 12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
| 19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| 26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
公告 |
|
| |
Campaign against Nikola Altomanovi
junshan0202 发表于 2012/8/2 10:33:00 |
In 1369, ?ura? laid siege to Kotor. Kotor, having no choice, turned to for support and sought for Hungarian suzerainty. Hungary sent a nobleman from to be the Prince of Kotor. This action only increased Kotor's troubles, as it lost its trade privileges with Serbia for a time, causing a larger economic turmoil for Kotor. By spring 1370, probably through Venetian mediation,Moncler
Down Jackets Women had made peace with Kotor. However, in the same year, Nikola Altomanovi? attacked Kotor.In 1371, ?ura? announced to that and his son, , along with their armies, were in with ?ura?, preparing an attack on Altomanovi?. Dubrovnik assisted their campaign by providing ships to transport men and supplies, since their campaign was in Dubrovnik's interests. However, the campaign never took place as Vuka?in and Marko went to aid Vuka?in's brother, , in a campaign against the Turks, which ended up in total disaster, Uglje?a being killed in the . Altomanovi? thought was now in even more trouble. Prince of Serbia and Ban of allied themselves to defeat Nikola Altomanovi?. Desperate for a strong ally, Altomanovi? began negotiations with ?ura?. Most historians agree that in concluding negotiations, ?ura? gained the towns of , and from Altomanovi?, possibly a bribe to remain neutral within the war. Other historians, however, follow 's account and argue that ?ura? never concluded such an agreement, rather conquered the towns he gained from the agreement himself after Altomanovi? was defeated in 1373.
After the Rivalry with Prince Marko, the son of , was crowned king and gained his father's lands. However, his friendship with the Bal?i?s soon crumbled. This was a result of ?ura?, in 1371, expelling his first wife Olivera, Marko's sister, and took from Marko. , prince of , conquered in the same year. ?ura? took a year later, stripping most of Marko's lands north of .Death ?ura? I died on 13 January 1378 in . However, recent studies now conclude that ?ura? died in 1379 rather than in 1378. The rule of Zeta was passed down to his younger brother, Moncler Outlet's death caused quite a stir between Zeta's neighbours. Bosnian Ban Tvrtko I annexed ?ura?'s territories bordering in 1377, along with the remainder of ?ura?'s coastal lands between the and the land previously annexed in 1377 at the time of his death. Tvrtko secured these possessions through ?ura?'s death, free of worry of any counter-attack.also took this opportunity to gain ?ura?'s land. Brankovi? sent his forces into and seized Prizren, along with the rest of ?ura?'s holdings in the region.Family and Children ?ura? I was married to two women: Olivera Mrnjav?evi? (daughter of ) before 1364 and Teodora Dejanovi?/Draga? (daughter of despot Dejan) after 1371. He had the following issue:Duration is a theory of and posited by the . Bergson sought to improve upon inadequacies he perceived in the philosophy of , due, he believed, to Spencer's lack of comprehension of , which led Bergson to the conclusion that time eluded mathematics and science. Bergson became aware that the moment one attempted to measure a moment, it would be gone: one measures an immobile, complete line, whereas time is mobile and incomplete. For the individual, time may speed up or slow down, whereas, for science, it would remain the same. Hence Bergson decided to explore the inner life of man, which is a kind of duration, neither a unity nor a quantitative . Duration is ineffable and can only be shown indirectly through images that can never reveal a complete picture. It can only be grasped through a simple of the imagination. |
|
|
